Follow us at
plmPartner
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Archive
  • Contact
  • Video Log
  • Learning Center
  • Privacy Policy

Customization – Do you fit in the box?

10/2/2015

2 Comments

 
Picture
One of the criteria when selecting a PLM platform (or any other software platform) is often how flexible it is and what kind of customizations that can be made.
First of all one should think of whether the strategy should be to keep to the Out Of The Box (OOTB) solution as much as possible or if your processes are so unique that they give the company such a competitive advantage that it would be dangerous to go with OOTB.

Of course if you ask the software vendors, the answer will be somewhere along the lines of: “The processes implemented are industry best practices, and we strongly recommend you to follow them. However the platform is highly customizable should you choose to implement special processes”

Such an answer actually gives more questions than answers.

First of all: What industry’s best practices? Keep in mind that most PLM platforms at least originates from aerospace or automotive industry, so make sure core processes are applicable in your industry as well.

Secondly: What is meant by customization? Does it mean additions or changes to the source code of the platform, or does the platform come with tools to easily add modifications or additions to the data model and GUI (Graphical User Interface) of the platform? If the latter is the case, how do you add business logic and behavior to the added data model and GUI?
The answers to such questions have a huge impact on Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) of the platform itself

After spending a lot of years both as solution architect and programmer in PLM projects in multiple industries I’ve learned that there are a lot of different shades of grey hidden in both scenarios.

If customization means additions or changes to source code, that is not necessarily bad provided that a clear and well documented Application Programming Interface (API) exist, and that your organization either have extensive knowledge and experience in the programming language, or have access to a trustworthy and reliable third party who can make the changes.

It then becomes an analysis of:
  • How much do we have to implement to meet our goals
  • How will the modifications impact the rest of the solution
  • How will the modifications impact the upgradeability of the platform

On the other hand if customization means that some kind of framework or tool exist in order to easily change or add to the data model and GUI you would instinctively assume that this would be preferable. 
From a technical point of view I would agree, BUT there are some dangerous pitfalls.

When additions are easy from a technical standpoint it also becomes easy to implement changes without doing the proper analysis work beforehand. The technical implementation cost might be low, but what about the consequences of putting the modifications in production from a business process view? Again how does the modifications impact upgradeability of the platform in the future, and does the modifications impact the rest of the platform?

In both scenarios, pure programming or easy customization, the same questions should be asked and the consequences of the answers should be analyzed before making a decision.

Some points to ponder
Bjorn Fidjeland



The image used in this post is by Bowie15 and purchased at dreamstime.com 
2 Comments
Erik Løber, BoostPLM ApS link
10/21/2015 10:39:21 am

I find the points made in this article valid and aligned with my own experience.
However, I miss the point regarding later upgrades and patching (security or bug) of the software from the software provider.

Some systems provides specific exits where user customization (code) can be added, and that will not be altered upon upgrades.

Reply
Bjørn Fidjeland
10/21/2015 10:52:12 am

Hi Erik, and thank you very much for your comment.
I totally agree with you regarding upgrades, and actually the follow up of this post is called: Customization – Upgradeability - (yet to be published).

The main question addressed in this post is: How will my customization impact the upgradeability of the platform?

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    plmPartner

    This is where we share our thoughts, ideas and experiences with you

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Categories

    All
    AEC
    BIM
    Data Management
    Digital Twin
    ERP
    Facility Lifecycle Management
    Integration
    Internet Of Things
    IOT
    Platform
    PLM
    Process
    Product Lifecycle Management
    Strategy
    Structured Data
    Technical Information Management
    VDC
    Virtual Design And Construction

Contact us:
plmPartner AS    Lyngfjellveien 14    4580 Lyngdal    Norway    +47 99 03 05 19    info@plmpartner.com